Mueller's opening remarks revealed some interesting details. For one, he indirectly disapproved of how Trump and Attorney General Bill Barr have referred to his work, saying 'we did not address 'collusion,' which is not a legal term.'
Robert Mueller on Wednesday released his opening statement for his long-awaited testimony on Capitol Hill. The former special counsel has said he will not stray outside of the final report his team released at the end of its two-year-long investigation into potential ties between the Trump campaign and Russian operatives trying to sway the 2016 election, as well as whether President Donald Trump tried to impede that probe.
Good morning Chairman Nadler, Ranking Member Collins, and members of the Committee. As you know, in May 2017, the Acting Attorney General asked me to serve as Special Counsel. I undertook that role because I believed that it was of paramount interest to the nation to determine whether a foreign adversary had interfered in the presidential election. As the Acting Attorney General said at the time, the appointment was “necessary in order for the American people to have full confidence in the outcome.” My staff and I carried out this assignment with that critical objective in mind: to work quietly, thoroughly, and with integrity so that the public would have full confidence in the outcome. The order appointing me as Special Counsel directed our Office to investigate Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election. This included investigating any links or coordination between the Russian government and individuals associated with the Trump campaign. It also included investigating efforts to interfere with, or obstruct, the investigation.First, we needed to do our work as thoroughly as possible and as expeditiously as possible. It was in the public interest for our investigation to be complete, but not to last a day longer than necessary.Our team would not leak or take other actions that could compromise the integrity of our work.Mueller's team was famous for being so tight-lipped. But there were moments when they weighed in, most notably to correct a BuzzFeedDuring the course of our investigation, we charged more than 30 defendants with committing federal crimes, including 12 officers of the Russian military. Seven defendants have been convicted or pled guilty. Certain of the charges we brought remain pending today. For those matters, I stress that the indictments contain allegations, and every defendant is presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty. In addition to the criminal charges we brought, as required by Justice Department regulations, we submitted a confidential report to the Attorney General at the conclusion of the investigation. The report set forth the results of our work and the reasons for our charging and declination decisions. The Attorney General later made the report largely public. As you know, I made a few limited remarks about our report when we closed the Special Counsel’s Office in May of this year. There are certain points that bear emphasis.the Russian government interfered in our election in sweeping andThis is a point that Mueller has been comfortable emphasizing. In his only prior public statement after concluding his investigation, Mueller said "the central allegation of our indictments, that there were multiple systemic efforts to interfere in our election. And that allegation deserves the attention of every American." Second, the investigation did not establish that members of the Trump campaign conspired with the Russian government in its election interference activities.Rather, we focused on whether the evidence was sufficient to charge any member of the campaign with taking part in a criminal conspiracy. It was not.This is an indirect rebuke of both President Donald Trump and Attorney General Bill Barr, who misleadingly stated in a press conference earlier this year that Mueller had found "no collusion." Mueller makes clear that that "collusion" is not something they even considered. Third, our investigation of efforts to obstruct the investigation and lie to investigators was of critical importance. Obstruction of justice strikes at the core of the government’s effort to find the truth and to hold wrongdoers accountable. Finally, as described in Volume 2 of our report, we investigated a series of actions by the President towards the investigation. Based on Justice Department policy and principles of fairness, weThat was our decision then and it remains our decision today.This is not as strong as what Mueller said in his prior statement. In that statement, made in May, Mueller made clear that, "as set forth in the report, after that investigation, if we had had confidence that the president clearly did not commit a crime, we would have said so." Mueller has left that out here.It is unusual for a prosecutor to testify about a criminal investigation, and given my role as a prosecutor, there are reasons whyMueller is managing expectations here. The Justice Department asked him to stay within the four corners of his report, and it seems like Mueller is prepared to comply.In some of these matters, court rules or judicial orders limit the disclosure of information to protect the fairness of the proceedings. And consistent with longstanding Justice Department policy, it would be inappropriate for me to comment in any way that could affect an ongoing matter.Mueller made 12 other criminal referrals after his probe ended, many of which are ongoing investigations. Second, the Justice Department has asserted privileges concerning investigative information and decisions, ongoing matters within the Justice Department, and deliberations within our office. These are Justice Department privileges that I will respect. The Department has released the letter discussing the restrictions on my testimony.Mueller further indicates that he will abide by DOJ recommendations on limiting his testimony. I therefore will not be able to answer questions about certain areas that I know are of public interest. For example, I am unable to address questions about the opening of the FBI’s Russia investigation, which occurred months before my appointment, or matters related to the so-called “Steele Dossier.” These matters are the subject ofAny questions on these topics should therefore be directed to the FBI or the Justice Department.The DOJ's internal watchdog is examining the role of the dossier in the FBI probe, and Barr is conducting a parallel review of the FBI's actions in 2016. As I explained when we closed the Special Counsel’s Office in May, our report contains our findings and analysis and the reasons for the decisions we made. We conducted an extensive investigation over two years. In writing the report, we stated the results of our investigation with precision.Mueller makes it clear that the language in the report was extremely deliberate — that's why, in May, he stated that the report is, in effect, his testimony. I do not intend to summarize or describe the results of our work in a different way in the course of my testimony today. As I said on May 29: the report is my testimony. And I will stay within that text.will not comment on the actions of the Attorney General or of Congress. I was appointed as a prosecutor, and I intend to adhere to that role and to the Department’s standards that govern it.Some believed Mueller might rebuke Barr's characterization of the report, which he released before the actual text was made available to the public. Mueller did confront Barr about it in a private letter that was leaked, but it doesn't look like he will address this in testimony. I will be joined today by the Deputy Special Counsel, Aaron Zebley. Mr. Zebley has extensive experience as a federal prosecutor and at the FBI, where he served as Chief of Staff. Mr. Zebley was responsible for the day-to-day oversight of the investigations conducted by our Office. I also want to again say thank you to the attorneys, the FBI agents, the analysts, and the professional staff who helped us conduct this investigation in a fair and independent manner. These individuals, who spent nearly two years working on this matter, were of the highest integrity. And let me say one more thing. Over the course of my career, I’ve seen a number of challenges to our democracy. The Russian government’s effort to interfere in our election is among the most serious. As I said on May 29, this deserves the attention of every American.Mueller emphasizes that this is the key threat to U.S. national security that the investigation was most focused on addressing and illuminating.
Australia Latest News, Australia Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
DOJ has not seen Robert Mueller's opening statementRobert Mueller will have a prepared opening statement for his much-anticipated congressional hearing on Wednesday that has not been seen by the Justice Department, according to a spokesman for the former special counsel.
Read more »
Mueller will make the full report his official statement to CongressRobert Mueller plans to make an opening statement and will have a long official statement for the record when he testifies before Congress on Wednesday.
Read more »
The Mueller Report's biggest open secret | OpinionThe Mueller Report's biggest open secret | Opinion (via SethAbramson)
Read more »
Robert Mueller testimony: Read the full text of ex-special counsel's opening statement to CongressMueller was appointed special counsel in May 2017 to look into the Kremlin&39;s efforts to sway the outcome of the 2016 election.
Read more »
Mueller Vows to Be as Boring as Possible In Opening StatementMueller opened his highly-anticipated testimony on Wednesday by throwing a big wet blanket over the entire media spectacle
Read more »