+34
A study found that Australia lacks an enforceable domestic ivory ban, allowing items of questionable origin to be sold domestically with little proof of legality. Researchers examined 1,698 ivory listings from 70 vendors and found that fewer than 1 percent included documentation confirming legal import. The findings highlight regulatory gaps and weak enforcement despite import restrictions and a government promise made seven years ago to ban the domestic sale of ivory.
There is no domestic ivory ban in Australia despite a promise seven years ago to create one. Roughly $1.2 million worth of elephant ivory objects were advertised in Australia in just six months last year.
A new study found less than 1 per cent of the objects were advertised with documentation proving their legality. But you can sell elephant ivory, through social media, without proof it has been ethically sourced. That is despite African and Asian elephant species being in danger of extinction from poaching for their tusks. About $1.2 million worth of ivory objects were advertised in Australia for sale over a six-month period last year through online stores, auction sites and Facebook Marketplace.
, found less than 1 per cent of the 1,698 ivory listings from 70 vendors were advertised with documentation that showed they were legally imported. About 9 per cent of items were advertised with a country of origin and 62 per cent with an approximate age.
"Very, very, few dealers mentioned up-front in their online listing that their item came with paperwork," the study's lead author Damien Huffer, an illicit tracking researcher at the University of Adelaide, said. "In the absence of enforceable laws requiring vendors to verify or disclose an item's composition, origin, or legality, ambiguity becomes the standard practice rather than the exception.
" The study suggested there was a lack of political will at state or federal levels of government to address legal loopholes where certification is required to import ivory but not to sell items within Australia. Ivory was once extensively used for decorative purposes either as full tusks or carved items.
Ivory can only be imported into Australia if it came from Asian elephants before 1975 and from African elephants before 1990, and if there is certification of the object's legitimacy. This is because Australia signed up to a treaty, known as the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species , that encourages members not to trade rhinoceros horn and elephant ivory as it fuels poaching of vulnerable species.
Asian elephant numbers are estimated to have halved to about 50,000 over the past 75 years. African elephants are thought to have once numbered in their millions, but by 1979 there was an estimated 1.3 million. Today there is about 400,000. Ten years ago, a conference of CITES members recommended closing domestic ivory trade markets because of concerns they supported poaching.
Why isn't there a domestic ban in Australia? Questions sent by the ABC to Environment Minister Murray Watt's office asking if a domestic ban would still be sought in Australia were redirected to the Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water . A DCCEEW spokesperson said the government would "continue to support the survival of iconic species to ensure that domestic markets for wildlife does not contribute to poaching or illegal trade".
"And Australia is not identified as a country with substantial ivory smuggling or seizures. "Australia has exceeded its CITES obligations by effectively banning almost all commercial imports and exports of African elephant items since 1990. " But Dr Huffer said it was relatively easy to launder recently poached ivory into Australia or anywhere else with active domestic markets. "Most other countries with such markets, however, are taking more action to close their markets, both physical and online.
"Scientists and conservation groups are not the only ones concerned by Australia's laws around domestic ivory sales. Auctioneers and Valuers Association of Australia chief executive Troy Williams said there needed to be a clear and nationally consistent framework governing the domestic trade in elephant ivory and rhinoceros horn.
"Provenance is fundamental when dealing with sensitive wildlife material, both for establishing legitimacy and giving buyers confidence about what they are purchasing," he said. Mr Williams said the lack of documentation demonstrated by the study was "noteworthy", highlighting the need for reform.
"AVAA supports a prohibition on commercial trade in elephant ivory and rhinoceros horn, accompanied by tightly defined exemptions for appropriate historical, cultural and other legitimate items. ""A nationally consistent framework would provide greater certainty for the auction sector while strengthening protections against unlawful trade. ""We are currently working on a paper that surveys 2019–2026 online auction listings for mammoth, narwhal, hippopotamus, orca, sperm whale, and warthog," he said.
Ivory Trade Wildlife Poaching Endangered Elephants Australian Regulation Online Marketplaces
Australia Latest News, Australia Headlines
Similar News: You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Nepal's dire warning to the rest of the worldJust days after a plea for global climate action, Nepal faces yet another disaster.
Read more »
US Court Reviews Trump's Third Attempt at Global Tariffs Following Previous Legal DefeatsThe US Court of International Trade heard arguments challenging the Trump administration's new tariffs on approximately 86 countries, imposed under forced labor provisions. This legal battle follows previous rulings by the Court and the Supreme Court that struck down earlier tariff initiatives as unlawful, with critics arguing the new measures are a transparent attempt to resurrect the rejected regime.
Read more »
Kooyonga Club Seeks Legal Clarity on 2027 LIV Adelaide Event Amid League's BankruptcyAdelaide's Kooyonga Golf Club has filed a motion in the U.S. bankruptcy court to force LIV Golf to confirm the 2027 Adelaide tournament's status by November. The move comes after LIV's financial instability following the withdrawal of Saudi backing, raising questions about the future of the event, players' commitments, and potential impacts on state funding and local investors.
Read more »
Teacher support team faces job cuts a week after minister's denialTasmanian Education Minister Jo Palmer's office claimed there were no proposals to cut a specialist team that works with teachers. A week later, the team is being cut by a quarter.
Read more »