Court judgment on social media posts is a blow to free speech

Australia News News

Court judgment on social media posts is a blow to free speech
Australia Latest News,Australia Headlines
  • 📰 smh
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 48 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 22%
  • Publisher: 80%

The Herald's View: Court judgment on social media posts is a blow to free speech

has faced having to defend in court articles we publish in our newspapers and on our websites but a judgment by the High Court on Tuesday has made clear we can also be liable for things we had no role in writing.

In fact, the judgment’s impact extends much wider than the media. Any community organisation, company or individual risks being sued for comments by third parties posted on their Facebook pages or other interactive social media.has made only modest changes to its social media policies because it wants to maintain the vital connection with readers through social media and considers its role in making accurate information widely available more important than ever.

Federal and state governments should clarify these issues in the current review of Australia’s defamation laws. The first stage of changes, which were implemented in most states in July this year, has addressed some of the issues by requiring a plaintiff to serve a notice of concern on the publisher before starting any court proceedings – a step that was not taken by Mr Voller in 2017 when the comments were made. Good publishers will take bad posts down.

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

smh /  🏆 6. in AU

Australia Latest News, Australia Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

High Court rules media outlets are responsible for Facebook comments in landmark caseHigh Court rules media outlets are responsible for Facebook comments in landmark caseThe High Court rules on whether media outlets should be legally responsible for comments left on their social media pages in a landmark case.
Read more »

Media outlets lose High Court appeal over Facebook defamation rulingMedia outlets lose High Court appeal over Facebook defamation rulingThe High Court has ruled that media outlets are legally responsible as publishers for third parties’ comments on their Facebook pages.
Read more »

High Court to determine whether media giants were publishers of allegedly defamatory commentsHigh Court to determine whether media giants were publishers of allegedly defamatory commentsThe High Court will today determine whether media giants were the publishers of allegedly defamatory comments posted on Facebook about former Northern Territory detainee Dylan Voller. The decision could have wide-ranging implications for how news outlets manage social media platforms.
Read more »

'He's bricked in his bedroom window': Wind farm test case begins in Supreme Court'He's bricked in his bedroom window': Wind farm test case begins in Supreme CourtThe Supreme Court Victoria will decide whether the sound from a wind farm, which two neighbours claim disrupted their sleep, was common law nuisance.
Read more »

Former Renewal SA boss set to face fresh court action months after case was thrown outFormer Renewal SA boss set to face fresh court action months after case was thrown outA high-profile former public servant is set to face fresh legal action in the District Court despite having his case thrown out by a magistrate less than three months ago.
Read more »

Mexico’s Supreme Court votes to decriminalise abortionMexico’s Supreme Court votes to decriminalise abortionThe decision comes one week after a Texas law took effect prohibiting abortions once medical professionals can detect cardiac activity in the fetus.
Read more »



Render Time: 2025-02-19 03:10:10