Court won’t fast-track Arizona AG’s election fight appeal

Australia News News

Court won’t fast-track Arizona AG’s election fight appeal
Australia Latest News,Australia Headlines
  • 📰 FOX10Phoenix
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 35 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 17%
  • Publisher: 68%

The Arizona Supreme Court on Wednesday refused to fast-track an appeal from Republican Attorney General Mark Brnovich after a judge sided with Democratic Secretary of State Katie Hobbs over election rules.

The decision means there is unlikely to be time before the general election for court battles to play out on Brnovich’s appeal and updated 2019 election rules will remain in place for the general election.to order Hobbs to do a major rewrite of a nearly 300-page document she wrote telling county election officials how to manage the 2022 elections.

The judge said Brnovich had waited so long to sue over his perceived problems with the manual that he could not order the few changes that may be merited. Judge John Napper instead sided with Hobbs and GOP Gov. Doug Ducey’s position and said the last manual approved by all three in 2019 would be in effect for the upcoming elections.

Brnovich has not filed a formal appeal, but asked the Arizona Supreme Court to let him bypass the court of appeals to the high court could hear the case quickly and act before the November elections. The Supreme Court said it had considered Brnovich’s request and determined it did not meet the standards for bypassing the lower appeals court.

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

FOX10Phoenix /  🏆 83. in US

Australia Latest News, Australia Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Mississippi Abortion Clinic Involved In Recent Supreme Court Decision Shuts DownMississippi Abortion Clinic Involved In Recent Supreme Court Decision Shuts DownAbortion access has become increasingly limited across wide swaths of the U.S. as conservative states enact restrictions or bans that took effect when the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade, the landmark 1973 ruling that legalized abortion nationwide.
Read more »

How the Supreme Court Could Approach Federal Laws Upholding—or Banning—AbortionHow the Supreme Court Could Approach Federal Laws Upholding—or Banning—AbortionThe Supreme Court’s decision to overturn Roe v. Wade has implications for legal readings of constitutional clauses regarding commerce and due process, among other topics.
Read more »

Independent California truckers scramble after Supreme Court refuses to hear AB5 caseIndependent California truckers scramble after Supreme Court refuses to hear AB5 caseA law designed to force gig-economy companies like Uber, Lyft and DoorDash to accept workers as employees is also having a profound impact on the trucking industry.
Read more »

The Supreme Court Needs an UpgradeThe Supreme Court Needs an UpgradeOn the latest What Next: President Biden has called the current Supreme Court “extremist.” What can he do about it?
Read more »

Wisconsin’s Supreme Court to rule on immunity in sex trafficking caseWisconsin’s Supreme Court to rule on immunity in sex trafficking caseWisconsin’s Supreme Court is set to decide Wednesday whether a sex trafficking victim accused of homicide can argue at trial that she was justified in killing the man who trafficked her, a ruling that could help define the extent of immunity for trafficking victims nationwide.
Read more »



Render Time: 2025-03-01 21:25:14