The director of Tasmania's Environment Protection Authority rejects calls to release real-time information on the amount of antibiotics used by salmon producers, despite the companies already providing that information to other government bodies.
Tas mania's EPA director has rejected calls to collect and release real-time data on antibiotic use by salmon companies, citing legal and accuracy concerns. The director of Tas mania's environmental watchdog has refused to begin collecting real-time information on antibiotic use by salmon companies, in a fiery exchange with Greens leader Rosalie Woodruff .
In budget estimates hearings this morning, Environment Protection Authority director Catherine Murdoch accused Dr Woodruff of launching "an attack on my integrity". Ms Murdoch questioned whether it would be legal to collect the information, despite other government agencies already doing so, and suggested the figures could be "factually incorrect".
In November, Tasmania's salmon industry was granted an emergency permit by the Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority to use florfenicol to treat a bacterial outbreak that had caused widespread deaths in salmon pens. It was the first time the antibiotic, which is more commonly applied in land-based farming, had been used in Australian waters.
The total amount of florfenicol used in that period has not yet been publicly reported by the EPA, with reports for each lease only required within three months of the treatment ending. Dr Woodruff told the budget estimates committee that salmon companies already informed other regulatory bodies in real time, including the APVMA and Biosecurity Tasmania.
" take bags of feed … that has been covered with florfenicol, and so they know how much has gone in," she said, asking why the EPA did not know those figures. Ms Murdoch questioned whether the information provided by companies would be "factually correct", also saying the EPA did not need the information.
"Tasmanians with an absence of information don't know what to read and they read a whole range of confusing and sometimes incorrect things. So surely we want to prevent this happening by treating people with the respect that they deserve," she said.
"To put on the record that I don't support transparency, I'm sorry, that is an attack on my integrity and I don't think it is appropriate for that to be stated to me at this table,"She told the committee the EPA's antibiotic-measuring regime was "timely" and done to the "best standards". At least 3,610 kilograms of florfenicol was used at five salmon farms in the D'Entrecasteaux Channel over the summer.
In total, 9,000 tonnes of fish died this past summer, compared with 14,000 in the year before, when florfenicol was not used. Dr Woodruff questioned why a clause in the Environmental Management and Pollution Control Act, which allows the director to request any information as part of an environmental licence, had not been used to request antibiotic treatment volumes.
Along with questioning whether she needed the data, Ms Murdoch told the committee she was unsure it was legal to release it.
"I'm sure my legal people will tell me I still have to apply that clause and ensure that in doing so, I'm complying with other legislation as well," she said. "Obviously, there is anti-competitive legislation, there's also RTI legislation … I do have to comply with that legislation. ""There was no requirement for that. We are out of public interest producing these reports on the amount," she told the committee.
Salmon companies were required to report to the EPA their maximum potential treatments, but Ms Murdoch declined a request to release that data.
"The ombudsman has clearly said to me, putting out factually incorrect … is not in the public's interest," Ms Murdoch said. "If I put out numbers that are incorrect to the public and then go, 'oops, sorry, a month later was 1,000 kilos less', that is not in the public interest in this really critical debate. "During the bacterial outbreak 18 months ago, salmon carcasses and 'fat balls' washed up on beaches in the south of the state.
The Bob Brown Foundation cited it as proof "the industry has completely lost control of the disease outbreak". In today's estimates hearing, independent MP Peter George asked if salmon companies would be hit with penalties for any regulatory breaches.
"In every other jurisdiction I've been in there is punishment, there are regulatory breaches that are prosecuted to reassure the public that the industry is held accountable," Mr George said. Ms Murdoch told the committee it was being investigated, and that her legal team was "finalising brief".
"It's a complex case and we want to make sure once we pass that onto the DPP we have a case that the DPP can properly look at,"
Tas Salmon Antibiotics Florfenicol Tassal Huon Aquaculture Greens Rosalie Woodruff Peter George Budget Estimates Tasmania
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Damning report questions what counts as a home in Tasmania's 10,000-home targetA financial review into Tasmania's soon-to-be-axed state housing authority says it relies too heavily on spreadsheets, and noted problems with transparency and effective decision-making.
Read more »
Tasmania Police Dismantle 3D-Printed Gun OperationTasmania Police have dismantled a significant operation producing illegal 3D-printed guns in southern Tasmania, seizing seven 3D printers, 13 firearms, and electronic files containing blueprints for 3D-printed guns.
Read more »
Labor's Budget Bills Delayed as Coalition and Greens NegotiateLabor's plans to pass its major budget bills through parliament by the end of June may be delayed due to negotiations between the Coalition, Greens, and crossbench to extend parliamentary inquiries into the government's tax changes and NDIS reforms.
Read more »
‘Avoiding scrutiny’: Coalition and Greens fight to delay Labor’s major budget billsThe Senate could team up to derail Labor’s agenda, with the Coalition seeking a longer tax inquiry while the Greens want more time to investigate sweeping changes to the NDIS.
Read more »