Last week’s dueling court rulings on abortion pills are refocusing attention on what legal powers the Food and Drug Administration has over prohibited drugs — and when it can disregard a prohibition.
the Food and Drug Administration has over prohibited drugs — and when it can disregard a prohibition.stands, and the abortion drug mifepristone no longer has FDA approval, then manufacturing, selling and distributing it will be outlawed.
But some legal experts say the agency has discretion to chart a path forward and keep some semblance of the status quo.that held agency decisions not to take enforcement actions aren’t subject to judicial review. And, they note, there’s already an established legal path for revoking a drug approval that involves public hearings and gives the manufacturer a say.Texas District Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk issued a decision pausing the FDA's 2000 approval of mifepristone, which is set to take effect on Friday.that mifepristone authorization cannot be taken away because it would alter the "status quo.
The Washington state decision, unlike Texas', takes effect immediately, said Oregon Attorney General Ellen Rosenblum, co-lead of a group of Democratic attorneys general who brought the case.
The case is expected to end up at the Supreme Court, which would consider the way in which the FDA approved mifepristone in 2000 and whether an 1870s federal law known as the Comstock Act prohibits the mailing of abortion pills, Donley and Rebouche said.The Biden administration has already appealed the Texas decision to the conservative-leaning U.S. Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals.
Australia Latest News, Australia Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
7 Foods Most Likely To Cause Food Poisoning, According to a Food ScientistFew things are less fun than coming down with a stomach bug.
Read more »
Dueling federal rulings plunge future of abortion pill into legal uncertainty'The president and I are going to stand with the women of America': Vice President Kamala Harris addressed a Texas federal judge's ruling on the abortion drug mifepristone.
Read more »
In a divided nation, dueling decisions on abortion pillConflicting rulings set up an extraordinary legal clash and could reshape abortion access in a nation where reproductive rights remain a polarizing issue.
Read more »
With dueling rulings, abortion pill cases appear headed to the Supreme CourtIf the Texas case reaches the Supreme Court, it could have implications far beyond access to abortion pills.
Read more »
With Dueling Rulings, Abortion Pill Cases Appear Headed to the Supreme CourtWASHINGTON — The dramatic dueling rulings by two federal district judges Friday about access to a widely used abortion pill set up a lower court conflict that legal experts say will almost certainly send the dispute to the Supreme Court. “It really turbocharges the imperative for the Supreme Court to step in and to do so sooner rather than later,” said Stephen Vladeck, a law professor at the University of Texas at Austin. A federal judge in Texas issued a preliminary ruling Friday invalidating t
Read more »