If we want to make home ownership more affordable for more young people seeking security of tenure for their home, the answer is to make home ownership less attractive as a form of investment. | OPINION
Like a lot of people who care about the state of the world we’re leaving to our children and grandchildren , I was pleased to see the period of spiralling house prices come to an end a few years back and prices start falling.
But, for Sydney and Melbourne, this sorely needed correction came to an end last year, after three interest-rate cuts and a change in prudential lending rules,If we can’t cut interest rates a little without an upsurge in borrowing causing us to resume bidding up house prices, we’ve got a problem. Our household debt is at near-record levels, but let’s add to it. Meanwhile, when you add falling house prices to the economy’s deeper problem of protracted weak wage growth, many home buyers worry and slash their consumer spending to try to reduce their debt. That huge household debt will be a drag on our economy for years, keeping growth low. Another issue that isn’t helping is our “new normal” of exceptionally low price and wage inflation. Until recent years, first-home buyers used to be able to load themselves up to the gunnels in debt and monthly payment obligation, secure in the knowledge that, after a few years of high growth in nominal wages, those repayments would be reduced to a much more manageable share of their income. When such “norms” get stuck in people’s heads, it can take years for people to realise they can no longer be relied on. And for those couples for whom the memo arrived too late, they’ll be struggling to keep up their huge mortgage payments for many more years than they bargained for.So, on one hand we’ve got the economy being held back by households’ huge level of debt and mortgage payments while, on the other, home ownership is becoming unattainable for an increasing proportion of the population. Those who do eventually manage to attain it have to scrimp on other aspects of their living standards, and often get there so much later in their working lives that their ability to save for retirement is diminished. The devouring monster we’ve allowed home ownership to become is now eroding what’s long been the fourth leg of retirement income policy. More people are retiring without owning a home, whereas the level of the age pension is kept low under the assumption that almost everyone owns their home outright. Get it? We’re suffering the wider economic disadvantages of huge household debt without the commensurate advantage of a higher rate of home ownership. The rate of home ownership is actually falling slowly as the oldies with high rates of home ownership are dying and being replaced by newly formed, young households, very few of which can afford a mortgage. But Reserve Bank governor Dr Philip Lowe has injected a note of hope. When measured against the ruler of household, America’s house prices are much lower than ours. Why? Because of differing policies towards housing. The Yanks have kept land prices lower by allowing more suburban sprawl. For our part, we’ve had various tax and pension policies seemingly intended to help would-be first-home buyers that, in reality, work to benefithome owners. We’ve made housing – whether owner-occupied or rental properties – a tax-preferred investment, not just a means to security of tenure. In the process, we’ve made it too hard for young first-home buyers to afford. When parents respond to this by recycling to their offspring some of the capital gain they’ve enjoyed on their own property investment , they’re solving their own children’s affordability problem in a way thathouse prices high, at the expense of those many young people whose parents aren’t able to help out. No, if we want to make home ownership more affordable for more young people seeking security of tenure for their home, the answer is to make home ownership
Australia Latest News, Australia Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Coronavirus: Christmas Island evacuees set to come home shortlyMore than 200 Australians who have been quarantined on Christmas Island for two weeks waiting to be cleared of any symptoms of the deadly coronavirus could be due to head home shortly
Read more »
Early uptake of first home loan deposit scheme favours single buyers, regionsNearly half the applicants using a new Federal Government scheme to purchase a property with a deposit of as little as 5 per cent are planning to buy outside Sydney, Melbourne or Brisbane.
Read more »
Heritage win as court blocks harbourside 'trophy' home redevelopmentControversial waterfront property development rejected on heritage grounds after a court was unsatisfied the property wouldn't be turned into a 'trophy' home.
Read more »
Engineers work to stabilise leaking Talgai dam as locals allowed back homeAuthorities say there is still a danger a leaking dam at Talgai could fail, as engineers work to stabilise its wall and construct a water bypass channel.
Read more »
Sarah’s baffling answer: ‘I’ll love Dad in 11 years when he’s home’Almost four years on from her mother’s brutal – and unexplained – death, Sarah Ristevski still refuses to think about how it may have happened or who was responsible despite her father’s guilty plea to his wife’s manslaughter.
Read more »
First home buyers leading 'recovery of the Australian housing market' | Sky News AustraliaHousing Minister Michael Sukkar says first home buyers are leading the “recovery of the Australian housing market”. \n\nHe said the market was recovering, in large part, due to the thousands of people who took advantage of the federal government's scheme which allowed property to be purchased with a deposit of as little as five per cent. \n\n“At last count about 6,500 people who are at some point of the process in either getting their pre-approval, securing a guarantee or, in some cases, having already settled on a property,” he said.\n\nAbout half the applicants have their sights set on properties outside capital cities, which Mr Sukkar said the government designed “deliberately” so it wasn’t centric to Melbourne, Sydney and Brisbane.\n\n“This could be very easily the type of scheme that gets used just in our major capital cities,' he said. \n\n“There was about half in our major capital cities, the other half outside.”\n\nMr Sukkar dismissed suggestions the $700,000 cap made it difficult to buy in major cities, but admitted, 'you’re no doubt looking at a fairly modest first home'. \n\nThe federal government initiative came into effect on January 1 2020. \n\nImage: Getty
Read more »