Justice Thomas rejects lawyer’s rationale for using race in admissions for diversity: 'Don't put much stock'

Australia News News

Justice Thomas rejects lawyer’s rationale for using race in admissions for diversity: 'Don't put much stock'
Australia Latest News,Australia Headlines
  • 📰 FoxNews
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 48 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 22%
  • Publisher: 87%

SCOTUS Justice Thomas said he doesn't put 'much stock' in the argument that affirmative action policies are needed to create 'diversity' during a case before the Supreme Court on Monday.

is not"discrimination, per se." Hinojosa also said much of the case has involved"strict scrutiny" on whether there is a different way to achieve student body diversity without considering race.

Thomas was unconvinced and said the court would not be so accepting of a contrary assertion by a college. Hinojosa said,"That's not this case. This case is about a limited classification involving a compelling interest.""That's not what I'm talking about. I'm talking about the court's deference. In that case, the court would put Virginia to the test. In this case, it does not. I am asking you why the difference?" Thomas responded.

Justice Clarence Thomas, normally one of the most reserved justices, was vocally involved in a Monday, Oct. 31, 2022, case on affirmative action in college admissions.is hearing two cases in which Students for Fair Admissions is suing a major university over its policy of including race as a factor in admissions decisions. The first case Monday was against UNC. The court is hearing a similar case against Harvard immediately following the UNC case.

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

FoxNews /  🏆 9. in US

Australia Latest News, Australia Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Affirmative action’s future waits as SCOTUS hears argumentsAffirmative action’s future waits as SCOTUS hears argumentsThe Supreme Court is hearing arguments on two cases surrounding affirmative action on college campuses. Here's what you need to know.
Read more »

As SCOTUS reviews affirmative action, Trump ally warns Biden's anti-whiteAs SCOTUS reviews affirmative action, Trump ally warns Biden's anti-whiteRadio ads being played in the South days before the midterm elections are asking, 'When did racism against white people become OK?'
Read more »

Trump asks SCOTUS to keep his tax records from HouseTrump asks SCOTUS to keep his tax records from HouseTrump had most recently sought the justices’ intervention in a legal dispute stemming from the search of his Mar-a-Lago estate in Florida in August. The court rejected that appeal.
Read more »

Supreme Court advancing ‘White supremacy’ if it rules against Harvard affirmative action policy: MSNBC guestSupreme Court advancing ‘White supremacy’ if it rules against Harvard affirmative action policy: MSNBC guestOn MSNBC, Demand Justice co-founder Christopher Kang said SCOTUS will be advancing 'White supremacy' if it rules against Harvard's affirmative action policy.
Read more »

Takeaways from SCOTUS affirmative action cases: Conservatives may overturn precedent allowing race as a factor in admissions | CNN PoliticsTakeaways from SCOTUS affirmative action cases: Conservatives may overturn precedent allowing race as a factor in admissions | CNN PoliticsThe Supreme Court is poised to say that colleges and universities can no longer take race into consideration in admissions programs, a decision that will likely overturn decades-old precedent and could diminish the number of African American and Hispanic students in higher education.
Read more »



Render Time: 2025-02-26 14:13:59