Jackson has been a powerful opposing voice as the right-wing court stripped rights from marginalized groups.
“She is a forceful presence,” said Margaret M. Russell, a professor at the Santa Clara University School of Law. “She seems willing to take on really any case, and to speak her mind and forge dissents that could one day be the majority opinion on the court.”
In her dissent on affirmative action, Jackson argues that the conservative majority is pushing a version of equality that is not rooted in the reality of the lived experiences of historically marginalized communities. This approach, referred to as “progressive originalism,” or even “Justice Jackson’s originalism” to some, appeared several times throughout the court term.
“To understand the Constitution is to understand that those were anti-slavery amendments,” Goodwin said. “So when people say, ‘The Constitution was never meant to talk about race,’ that’s historically inaccurate.”according to a report by Adam Feldman Beyond the volume of her words, experts note that Jackson also stands out in the way she speaks about the issues before the court. In a departure from many other Supreme Court justices, Jackson seems concerned with the individual human impact of the court’s decisions, said Tonja Jacobi, a professor of law at Emory University.
Australia Latest News, Australia Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson blasts 'let-them-eat-cake obliviousness' in Supreme Court affirmative action dissentJustice Ketanji Brown Jackson accused the Supreme Court's conservative majority of a 'let-them-eat-cake obliviousness' on the issue of race in its landmark ruling on affirmative action.
Read more »
Clarence Thomas and Ketanji Brown Jackson criticize each other sharply in affirmative action caseThe Supreme Court's landmark ruling on affirmative action pitted two of its justices against each other, with the ideologically opposed jurists employing unusually sharp language attacking each other.
Read more »
Ketanji Brown Jackson Exposed the Supreme Court’s “Colorblind” LieIf the past year has taught us anything, it’s that some of the justices on the current Supreme Court really don’t live under the same sky as everyone else.
Read more »
Clarence Thomas and Ketanji Brown Jackson criticize each other sharply in affirmative action caseThe Supreme Court's landmark ruling on affirmative action pitted two of its justices against each other, with the ideologically opposed jurists employing unusually sharp language attacking each other.
Read more »
Clarence Thomas, Ketanji Brown Jackson air sharp disagreement on race in AmericaThomas accused Jackson of promoting a “race-infused world view.” Jackson said Thomas was ignoring the facts.
Read more »
Clarence Thomas and Ketanji Brown Jackson criticize each other sharply in affirmative action caseThe Supreme Court's landmark ruling on affirmative action pitted two of its justices against each other, with the ideologically opposed jurists employing unusually sharp language attacking each other.
Read more »