Why does the Supreme Court keep having ethics scandals? Because the justices are allowed to enforce the rules themselves, RWPUSA writes.
requires federal judges and justices to recuse from cases in which their impartiality might reasonably be questioned, including cases in which their spouses have interests. By way of example, if a justice’s wife is involved in efforts to overturn a presidential election, the justice should recuse from cases involving the presidential election and those efforts.
Yet when the House Jan. 6 committee subpoenaed documents that included communications between White House staff members and Ginny Thomas about overturning the 2020 election, her husband refused to recuse himself when the Trump administration’s appeal to stay the subpoena reached the high court. This was not only morally wrong but also a clear violation of the recusal statute.
Indeed, federal district and appeals judges are already subject to outside oversight, which includes investigations and imposition of discipline by the Judicial Conference of the United States. But the justices of the Supreme Court alone enforce the ethics rules for themselves. And their approach is to allow each justice alone to decide how, or whether, to comply with the law. Colleagues cover for colleagues.
The solution is the same as in other instances of professional misbehavior in close-knit groups of colleagues. We need meaningful supervision, with investigations of alleged wrongdoing and sanctions for those who violate rules. First, the Supreme Court needs a full-time ethics lawyer appointed by the chief justice with the consent of the eight other justices. The ethics lawyer would advise the justices, preferably in writing, about how to comply with the ethics rules in specific instances.
The justices interpret the Constitution and laws of the U.S. in decisions binding on lower courts and that affect all of our lives. They have lifetime tenure, but we have seen that tenure combined with colleagues covering for colleagues doesn’t work. Nobody is above the law. The justices also must obey the law. The court can’t be allowed to become an Animal House of ethics, and if the justices think there’s nobody to supervise them, Congress will need to show them that they are badly mistaken.
Australia Latest News, Australia Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Clarence 'Private Jet' Thomas Is Getting People KilledRight-wing nuttiness has now been enshrined into the Constitution by Clarence Thomas and the five other extremist justices who signed onto his devastating ruling on guns.
Read more »
New Clarence Thomas Podcast Debuts Amid the Justice’s Season of Scandal: “A Man Who Feels He’s Under Siege”Slow Burn host Joel Anderson talks to Vanity Fair about what he discovered while tracing the controversial conservative’s life—and his fear that Thomas and others are “beyond accountability to the American people.”
Read more »
Here are Thursday's biggest analyst calls: Target, Tesla, Toast, Chevron, Meta, Toll Brothers & moreHere are Thursday's biggest calls on Wall Street.
Read more »
Tarrant County to consider closing 'nuisance' strip club after violent crimesLast year, sheriff's deputies responded to 134 calls, and this year more than 80 calls to the Temptations Cabaret on Camp Bowie and West Boulevard.
Read more »
King County authority approves 5-year plan to address region’s homeless crisisThe five-year plan calls for around $250 million of spending next year.
Read more »