The Supreme Court just undid a key ruling for counting undated Pa. mail ballots

Australia News News

The Supreme Court just undid a key ruling for counting undated Pa. mail ballots
Australia Latest News,Australia Headlines
  • 📰 PhillyDailyNews
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 39 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 19%
  • Publisher: 67%

Daily News | The Supreme Court just undid a key ruling for counting undated Pennsylvania mail ballots

, injecting new uncertainty into an issue that could affect thousands of votes in next month’s elections.a consistent political and legal fight

Because the appeals court decision had upended the legal landscape — paving the way for undated mail ballots to be counted across the state for this first time in this year’s primary election — Republicans have seen that ruling as a barrier to their argument. Now that the U.S. Supreme Court has undone that ruling, Republicans are likely to go to court to again challenge the practice of counting undated Pennsylvania mail ballots.

Adam Bonin, a Democratic lawyer in the Lehigh County case at issue, said the Supreme Court’s decision was “disappointing,” but he emphasized that state courts have recently relied on state law to rule in favor of counting undated mail ballots. That means undated ballots should still be counted this November, he argued.

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

PhillyDailyNews /  🏆 89. in US

Australia Latest News, Australia Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Supreme Court upends Pennsylvania precedent permitting undated mail-in ballotsSupreme Court upends Pennsylvania precedent permitting undated mail-in ballotsThe Supreme Court erased Tuesday a lower court ruling that had allowed the counting of undated mail-in ballots in a local Pennsylvania election.
Read more »

Endorsement: Retain Chief Justice Patricia Guerrero, Supreme Court and appeals justicesEndorsement: Retain Chief Justice Patricia Guerrero, Supreme Court and appeals justicesEndorsement: Retain Chief Justice Patricia Guerrero, Supreme Court and appeals justices (via latimesopinion)
Read more »

Supreme Court declines to hear case on fetal personhoodSupreme Court declines to hear case on fetal personhoodNEW: The Supreme Court has decided against hearing a case on whether fetuses are entitled to constitutional rights following the court's decision to overturn Roe v. Wade.
Read more »



Render Time: 2025-02-25 21:51:45