This sleeper Supreme Court case could be a nightmare for corporations

Australia News News

This sleeper Supreme Court case could be a nightmare for corporations
Australia Latest News,Australia Headlines
  • 📰 Reuters
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 30 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 15%
  • Publisher: 97%

A little-noticed U.S. Supreme Court case involving a Virginia railroad worker’s Pennsylvania state court suit against his onetime employer could drastically expand plaintiffs’ ability to sue corporations in states where businesses are neither headquartered nor incorporated.

that corporations are subject to suit in states where they have consented to jurisdiction as a condition of registering to conduct business.

The state justices rooted their decision in the line of U.S. Supreme Court cases that began with 1945’s, holding that International Shoe and its progeny focused jurisdictional analysis on a corporation’s contacts with the state. When the amendment was ratified in 1868, the brief said, every state had a law in place that required out-of-state corporations to consent to jurisdiction, reflecting the increasingly interstate nature of the American economy. So it cannot be, the brief argued, that “when the Fourteenth Amendment was ratified, it invalidated important statutes in every state.

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

Reuters /  🏆 2. in US

Australia Latest News, Australia Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Washington Supreme Court to decide capital gains tax caseWashington Supreme Court to decide capital gains tax caseThe Washington Supreme Court has agreed to review a decision by a lower court that overturned a new capital gains tax on high-profit stocks, bonds and other assets. FOX13
Read more »

Opinion | Right-Wing Zealots on the Supreme Court Threaten to Make American Theocracy a RealityOpinion | Right-Wing Zealots on the Supreme Court Threaten to Make American Theocracy a Reality'We must expand the Supreme Court. If we don't, six extremist judges will continue to overturn the will of voters and destroy our rights.'
Read more »

Op-Ed: Dobbs isn't the first time the Supreme Court took away key rightsOp-Ed: Dobbs isn't the first time the Supreme Court took away key rights'Reconstruction teaches us that when extremist movements tell you where they are headed, you should believe them. America should not go backwards on rights yet again,' writes Christopher M. Richardson, a former U.S. diplomat. (via latimesopinion)
Read more »

House Democrats block GOP resolution capping number of Supreme Court justices at nineHouse Democrats block GOP resolution capping number of Supreme Court justices at nineDemocrats in the House of Representatives blocked a Republican resolution seeking to amend the Constitution and cap the number of Supreme Court justices at nine.
Read more »

Montgomery County Ramps Up Enforcement Outside Supreme Court Justices' HomesMontgomery County Ramps Up Enforcement Outside Supreme Court Justices' HomesProtests outside the homes of justices Brett Kavanaugh and John Roberts have been ongoing for weeks.
Read more »

Pa. Supreme Court ruling keeps alive litigation over who operates 5 shortlinesPa. Supreme Court ruling keeps alive litigation over who operates 5 shortlinesThe validity of a 2015 SEDA-COG Joint Rail Authority vote on an operating agreement is the remaining issue before the court.
Read more »



Render Time: 2025-03-01 02:55:25