+34Goodman Group has abandoned its $1.2 billion Project Mars data centre in Lane Cove West after 374 public submissions and a Senate inquiry, as community opposition reshapes data centre planning across Australia.
Goodman Group has withdrawn its plan for a $1.2 billion data centre in Lane Cove West, the third data centre proposal pulled in Australia in five months.
The company told the NSW planning department it would no longer pursue Project Mars, a 90 megawatt facility that would have sat about 20 metres from the nearest home and 160 metres from Lane Cove West Public School. The proposal drew 374 public submissions. Only nine were in favour. Goodman's letter said the policy and regulatory environment for large data centres had evolved significantly, and that it had weighed those changes against the views of the local community.
Campaigners celebrate Goodman withdrawal
Sasha Titchkosky, a spokeswoman for the Lane Cove Responsible Planning Group, said she was ecstatic. She credited six months of campaigning, a run of bad press for Goodman, a shareholder resolution the group lodged last week, and the Senate hearing that followed. Last week was really the straw that broke the camel's back, she told this masthead. It was just too much heat.
The campaign had been building since at least May, when the group's petition passed 1134 signatures and its members gave evidence to the NSW parliament's data centre inquiry. Stefano Lauria, one of the residents who first contacted this masthead, wrote then that he worked in AI himself. The group was not opposed to data centres in principle, he said, only to this site.
At the federal Senate inquiry's first public hearing last week, Liberal senator Sarah Henderson told Goodman's general manager of developments Ben McGilp that the proposal showed contempt for local residents and asked him to withdraw it on the spot. Goodman withdrew it five days later. The state's utilities also had their doubts. Sydney Water said it could not support the project without more detail on its water demand.
Ausgrid raised electrocution and fire risks. The plans included a million litres of diesel stored on site. Titchkosky said the business park was built for light industry, and data centres are nothing of the sort. They run diesel back-up generators and emit noise 24 hours a day, seven days a week, she said.
Industry claims Australian anger borrowed
For most of this year the industry has argued that Australian anger is borrowed. Belinda Dennett, chief executive of Data Centres Australia, said in a March speech that the local debate was being fought on America's facts. The US has about 5400 data centres; Australia has 252. Titchkosky called the industry's early response, that there was nothing to see here because Australia had always had data centres, really disingenuous.
Dennett struck a different note on Tuesday. The policies under which developers commenced approval processes are changing. Community expectations are also changing, she told this masthead. Community backlash against data centres has already reached fever pitch in the US.
A Gallup poll in March found 70 per cent of Americans opposed a new AI data centre in their own neighbourhood. In July, New York Governor Kathy Hochul imposed the first statewide pause on large data centre permits. Texas followed in August, freezing new approvals until its grid is audited. Dennett warned that until governments settle the rules, more data centre customers, investors and developers are likely to adopt a wait-and-see approach to Australia.
Her group supports a national approach to regulation, more engagement with communities, and faster approvals. But data centres' customers and investors have choices, and many countries are actively encouraging investment, she said. Victoria is moving to require 150 metre buffers between data centres and homes. NSW has introduced a 75 day fast track for projects that fund their own extra water and power supply.
Calls for evidence-based siting rules
It sets no minimum distance from anyone's house. Titchkosky wants siting rules based on evidence. She also wants designated data centre precincts, with the infrastructure, probably including recycled water, built in from the start. Just siting them anywhere where there happens to be a power connection is really not the right way to go about this, she said.
It's giving the industry a bad name and really impacting the social licence of the industry. Meanwhile, other developers are digging in. AirTrunk is actively scaling up its planned 1.2 gigawatt campus at Kemps Creek in Sydney's west, despite similar community backlash. Sydney alone has 41 state significant data centre projects in the pipeline, 18 already approved.
Anthropic is negotiating a $21 billion commercial deal with private developers to make Australia a regional hub for running its AI inference models. The computing infrastructure to power artificial intelligence the industry wants has to be built next to someone. If the neighbours can now stop it, where it goes has suddenly become a multibillion dollar national problem.
The international consultancy CT Group has already told its clients that local opposition is now the decisive risk in getting a data centre built. The Lane Cove group belongs to a national alliance of communities fighting data centres. Titchkosky said Monday's result had given the others some energy and some hope. Her neighbours are planning a street party once one of their core organisers gets back from holiday.
Titchkosky has a test for the next developer eyeing a business park beside homes. Proponents should ask themselves, if I was in the residents' shoes, would I want that data centre built there, she said. If it's so hard to explain, and if you can't enunciate the benefits, then maybe that is an indication that the data centre doesn't belong there. It's a question her neighbours will likely be asking again soon.
Up the road from where they are planning a party, AirTrunk is still seeking approval for a 37 metre, 140 megawatt data centre on Mars Road. The $600 million GreenSquare project in the Perth suburb of Hazelmere was sunk by community campaigns in May, and a proposal in Katoomba in the Blue Mountains was withdrawn in June.
smh
theage:This story was compiled and edited by the HeadTopics newsroom and HT AI from the reports above.
Goodman Group Project Mars Data Centre Community Opposition NSW Data Centre Planning Airtrunk Kemps Creek
Australia Latest News, Australia Headlines
Similar News: You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Goodman Group Shelves Project Mars Data Centre Development in Sydney Amid ControversyGoodman Group have confirmed they will no longer proceed with the Project Mars data centre development in Sydney.
Read more »
Plan for controversial $1.2bn datacentre in Sydney scrapped due to ‘emerging’ regulationsDeveloper Goodman Group says changes in government rules are behind decision to pull plug on ‘Project Mars’ in Lane Cove
Read more »
Goodman Group Abandons $800 Million Project Mars Data Centre in Lane Cove WestGoodman Group withdrew its state-significant application for an $800 million, 81-megawatt data centre in Lane Cove West after resident outrage and concerns from Sydney Water and Ausgrid about infrastructure strain, electrocution and fire risks.
Read more »
Goodman Group withdraws $1.2b Lane Cove West data centre after 374 submissionsGoodman Group has abandoned its $1.2 billion Project Mars data centre in Lane Cove West after 374 public submissions and a Senate inquiry, as community opposition reshapes data centre planning across Australia.
Read more »