The UK supreme court has unanimously ruled that the government’s plan to send asylum seekers to Rwanda is unlawful. The court found that asylum seekers sent to Rwanda may be at risk of refoulement and cited evidence from the UN refugee agency (UNHCR) that Rwanda does not respect the principle of non-refoulement.
The UK supreme court has unanimously ruled that the government’s plan to send asylum seekers to Rwanda is unlawful. Upholding an earlier decision by the court of appeal, the supreme court found that asylum seekers sent to Rwanda may be at risk of refoulement – being sent back to a country where they may be persecuted, tortured or killed. The courts cited extensive evidence from the UN refugee agency ( UNHCR ) that Rwanda does not respect the principle of non-refoulement – a legal obligation.
The UNHCR’s evidence questioned the ability of Rwandan authorities to fairly assess asylum claims. It also raised concerns about human rights violations by Rwandan authorities, including not respecting non-refoulement with other asylum seekers. It is important to note that the supreme court’s decision is not a comment on the political viability of the Rwanda plan, or on the concept of offshoring asylum processes generally. The ruling focused only on the legal principle of non-refoulement, and determined that in this respect, Rwanda is not a “safe third country” to send asylum seekers
UK Supreme Court Government Asylum Seekers Rwanda Unlawful Refoulement UNHCR Non-Refoulement Human Rights Violations
Australia Latest News, Australia Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Kenya and Rwanda to Open Borders to All AfricansKenya and Rwanda have announced plans to open their borders to visitors from all of Africa without requiring visas. This move aims to promote business and entrepreneurship across the continent. By the end of 2022, several African countries had already implemented visa-free access for all Africans.
Read more »
Peter Dutton criticizes Labor's response to High Court decision on asylum seeker detaineesPeter Dutton has revealed the government has not briefed him on its looming legislative response to the release of more than 80 detainees as he unleashes on Labor's confused reaction the High Court decision.
Read more »
Man accused of attacking Nancy Pelosi's husband testifies in courtDavid DePape, the man accused of attacking Nancy Pelosi's husband, testified in court about his motivations and plans for interrogating the former house speaker.
Read more »
Australian government seeks solution after High Court rules detention illegalThe Australian government is looking for a solution after the High Court ruled that it was illegal to keep people in immigration detention indefinitely. The government has commissioned the Australian Federal Police and the Australian Border Force to manage the detainees who have been released under strict visa conditions. Opposition Leader Peter Dutton calls for a legislative fix to ensure community safety.
Read more »
ANZ Bank Settles High-Profile Court Claim with Perth EntrepreneursLeaked settlement deeds reveal ANZ bank's efforts to end a high-profile court claim with Perth entrepreneurs Pankaj and Radhika Oswal. The settlement involved a payment of $169 million and assistance with outstanding taxes. The dispute had lasted for years and involved billions of dollars. The Oswals have since acquired a new home in Switzerland.
Read more »
Australian government to introduce emergency legislation in response to high court decisionImmigration minister Andrew Giles has confirmed the government will introduce emergency legislation to respond to the high court decision, which has resulted in the release of 83 people from detention.
Read more »