Australian insurers can’t discriminate against clients on the basis of their health. So why are they doing everything they can to have people feed them sensitive health and fitness data?
If you’re looking for the must-have object for the era of self-optimisation, designed to ensure your life runs as efficiently as possible, look no further than the smartwatch.
In fact, the only thing now standing between insurers and the unimpeded use of health and fitness data collected by smartwatches is industry regulation to prevent discrimination. No insurance company can legally deny you a policy based on data generated by a Fitbit, an Apple Watch or a Garmin. Which makes insurers’ fascination with feeding smartwatch-generated health data into their algorithms all the more intriguing, according to privacy advocates.
Yet the privacy risks that come with the flow of data from wearable technology to insurers don’t tend to attract much media attention; nor does the question if consumers downloading applications or linking devices to insurers are in a position to offer informed consent. Circumventing regulatory restrictions, these rewards are crucial. Australian health insurers are governed by a community rating system – which means that, regardless of health status, age, gender or any other factor, individuals will be charged the same premium as every other member living within their state.
“When a NIB member uses our ‘Well with NIB’ app, we may collect personal information to send communications to our members which contain personalised health information, products, and services,” Close said. ‘We’ve got no means to know how pricing of insurance works because companies keep it completely secret.’Data generated by wearable devices offers insurers a big advantage. Not only can they get to know their customers better, but they can also fine-tune algorithms to profile people in a more detailed way. How those profiles will be used in the future is unclear.
Australia Latest News, Australia Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Wellness apps and fitness trackers: Why insurers love your smartwatchAustralian insurers can’t discriminate against clients on the basis of their health. So why are they doing everything they can to have people feed them sensitive health and fitness data?
Read more »
'Designed as winter tents': Why are Australian homes so cold in the winter?As rental advocacy groups call for minimum standards in housing, researchers are finding links between cold homes and the occupants' physical and mental health.
Read more »
Why US-Kenya cooperation on wildlife and drug trafficking mattersCooperation between the two countries on tackling illicit trade in wildlife and narcotics has yielded some notable success in the recent past.
Read more »
The two reasons why ANZ is chasing MYOBOPINION: If the deal goes ahead, ANZ would be the seventh owner of MYOB in the past 25 years, including two stints as a public company, the latter of which ended with KKR’s $2.4 billion privatisation in May 2019.
Read more »
Struck dumb: why ‘the voice of God’ got booted out of documentariesOnce, no serious documentary could be without its authoritative voiceover in perfect English. But film-makers are now rejecting the whole idea. Are social media and post-truth politics to blame?
Read more »
‘Lawful and reasonable’: Why bosses can force you back to the officeAs the number of employees taking sick days rises across the country, companies are being told to go it alone to decide their own work from home policies.
Read more »