Government wants to back parents against ‘huge tech giants’ though some feel the process has been rushed
The move by Labour follows a consultation with the public looking at ways to reduce harms young people face online. The move by Labour follows a consultation with the public looking at ways to reduce harms young people face online.
Government wants to back parents against tech companies though some feel the process has been rushedaccessing harmful social media apps, a move the government has framed as taking the side of parents against the big technology companies. A consultation on online safety closed on 26 May, giving ministers just weeks to come up with policies after receiving more than 116,000 responses. Industry sources and child safety advocates have described the process as “rushed” and driven by a political timeline.
It is not clear when the ban could come into force. Key to the ban is one of the thorniest issues in technology regulation worldwide: how can tech companies verify details about their users without invasive measures – such as requiring government-issued IDs? The UK regulator Ofcom offers some flexibility in how age verification is done under the Online Safety Act. That could change under the ban.
Starmer is preparing to ban access for under-16s to a number of social media apps – sources close to the process expect this to include all the major social media apps. Currently, the age restriction for major social media platforms is 13 but there is no official government-mandated age limit. He is also expected to announce restrictions for platforms that are not banned, with certain features withheld for under-16s. Those features will include chats with adult strangers and livestreaming.
It has also been reported that 16 and 17-year-olds will be set time limits for using social media. Why is the government introducing an age limit? The prime minister has been sceptical about introducing a ban. His concerns have included whether such a move would push teenagers on to the dark web or leave them with the “cliff edge” scenario of entering the world of social media at the age of 16 with no experience of how to handle it.
However, the introduction of an under-16 ban in Australia has led to a change of heart, having prompted many Labour MPs and some cabinet ministers to push for the UK to do the same. In January, more than 60 Labour MPs wrote to the prime minister calling for a ban. There has also been a steady drumbeat of pressure from safety campaigners for further restrictions, although views on an under-16 ban are mixed within that group.
The Molly Rose Foundation, a charity established by the family of Molly Russell, a British teenager who took her own life after viewing harmful online content, said a ban would be “unenforceable” and “masks the absence of any credible plan to stop childhoods being blighted and young lives lost by out of control algorithms”. Social media apps have been placed under a blanket ban in Australia, where the age limit applies to any service that allows social interaction between two or more users and whether it allows users to post material.
As a result, a broad range of apps are banned, from TikTok and YouTube to Snapchat, X, Instagram and Facebook.has said a “substantial proportion” of under-16s in the country kept their accounts, managed to create new ones or have bypassed age gating systems. However, the commissioner added that a “significant number of social media accounts of children aged under 16” have been removed, deactivated or restricted from signing into platforms.
Tech companies will be required to determine how old their users are in order to prevent under-16s from accessing social media. This already happens under the UK’s Online Safety Act, which requires major tech platforms to prevent under-18s from accessing pornography as well as eating disorder and self-harm content.
That is done through what Ofcom calls “highly effective age assurance”, which are a set of approved ways tech companies can use to verify their users are old enough to access certain materials.
“Highly effective age assurance” can include facial age estimation, credit card age checks and email-based age analysis as well as verifying a user’s digital ID. It is not clear whether the UK ban will allow the same flexibility for tech platforms to verify their users’ ages or whether it will require them to use more specific methods. Platforms such as Google and Meta have put forward their own views on how age verification should be conducted.
The responsibility could fall on app developers – such as Meta or Snapchat – or on the makers of devices, who gatekeep the app stores on a phone. There has been speculation that tech firms may seek a judicial review – a legal process where government decisions can be challenged.
However, it is how the decision was made that could be challenged, not the decision itself.
Please follow us on Google to support us Australia Latest News, Australia Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
NSW players support Klein following gambling report as Blues training gives huge call on MosesNSW players support Klein following gambling report as Blues training gives huge call on Moses
Read more »
As voter disillusionment grows, why aren't voters flocking to the Greens in Australia?Growing voter dissatisfaction with mainstream politics has led to a rise in popularity for One Nation. The same cannot be said for the Greens.
Read more »
Government to make drone exemption permanent after shark attackThe government has granted a temporary exemption for drones to be flown over Coogee Beach to aid in shark mitigation after a woman was left fighting for her life in hospital following a shark attack. Minister for Agriculture Tara Moriarty said the government would work to make the exemption permanent.
Read more »
Government accused of creating black market in illicit tobaccoThe Australian government is being accused of creating a black market in illicit tobacco, with experts saying the high excise on legitimate cigarettes has driven smokers to cheaper, illegal alternatives. The problem is costing the government an estimated $7 billion in lost tax excise, and is also linked to other crimes such as heroin distribution and child exploitation.
Read more »