Why long-term economic growth often disappoints

Australia News News

Why long-term economic growth often disappoints
Australia Latest News,Australia Headlines
  • 📰 TheEconomist
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 72 sec. here
  • 3 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 32%
  • Publisher: 92%

When technological progress is properly understood, the world has been on broadly the same path for centuries

Save time by listening to our audio articles as you multitaskA new paper suggests such disappointment is not warranted—because it stems from an equally huge misunderstanding of how economic progress happens. Thomas Philippon, a professor of finance at New York University, argues the post-war experience was unusual.

Most economists’ starting point for thinking about growth is Robert Solow’s 1956 paper, “A contribution to the theory of growth”. Mr Solow’s model forrelies on what he dubs the “production function”. It is a mathematical black box: on one side labour and capital go in; out the other come all the consumer goods and services that contribute to people’s standard of living. One way of growing is obvious: shove more labour and capital into the box. But that cannot deliver improvements for ever.

Instead long-term growth can only come from improving the black box—the way in which labour and capital are combined. The fancy name economists give to this is total factor productivity , though they sometimes refer to it with more intuitive labels, such as technology or knowledge. You might think of it as a recipe. On one side lie labour and capital, the ingredients. On the other is the finished dish: economic output.

This is not a counsel of despair. While the rate of growth in percentage terms may be slowing, Mr Philippon’s model predicts that the size of any increment is roughly constant. Societies do get richer—but just not as fast as generally thought.growth does temporarily accelerate and the annual increment gets higher. His paper plots one such moment in Britain between 1650 and 1700, and another around 1830, consistent with when historians date the first and second Industrial Revolutions.

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

TheEconomist /  🏆 6. in UK

Australia Latest News, Australia Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

What is the Northern Ireland protocol and why is it back in the news?What is the Northern Ireland protocol and why is it back in the news?What might the UK government do next and where would this leave Northern Ireland?
Read more »

Silent salons: why people are choosing to keep quiet at the hairdresserSilent salons: why people are choosing to keep quiet at the hairdresserRequests for no-talking haircuts are becoming more common. Now some salons even provide pre-treatment questionnaires about the practice
Read more »

Why isn't Holly Willoughby on This Morning and when will she return?Why isn't Holly Willoughby on This Morning and when will she return?Holly Willoughby won’t be appearing on This Morning this week – but she’s got a very good reason...
Read more »

Why I Still Love Enrique Iglesias’s ’00s StyleWhy I Still Love Enrique Iglesias’s ’00s StyleLeather trousers, tight tees – what’s not to like about Enrique Iglesias’s wardrobe?
Read more »

Scarlet O’Haha: why do film posters for comedies always have huge red letters?Scarlet O’Haha: why do film posters for comedies always have huge red letters?From The Nan Movie to Fun with Dick and Jane, ads for comedies nearly always follow one distinctive style. Why is this and when did it start? The humble bus shelter may have the answer
Read more »



Render Time: 2025-03-28 07:20:39