Why scientist Eddie Holmes changed his mind on the origins of COVID-19

Australia News News

Why scientist Eddie Holmes changed his mind on the origins of COVID-19
Australia Latest News, Australia Headlines

The renowned Australian virologist considered the possibility the virus leaked from a Wuhan lab, before changing his mind. He never expected his considerations to be at the centre of an international debate.

Second, the furin cleavage site was clearly “atypical” and not the type a scientist would insert as part of an experiment. And most crucially, data came in from a Hong Kong team that was sequencing coronaviruses found in pangolins seized by Chinese customs.

The coronaviruses had receptor-binding domains nearly identical to those seen in SARS-CoV-2. “It was there in pangolins, which really showed it was natural,” Holmes says. “And if the receptor binding domain is natural why not the furin cleavage site?”asked four scientists on whether Holmes’ conduct was a normal part of the scientific practice or a cover-up. Should the scientists have disclosed their earlier fears about a lab leak? “No. Absolutely not. Not the prior talks, no. Certainly, not in a scientific paper,” says Professor Sujatha Raman, who holds chair in science communication at the Australian National University. Scientists should debate hypotheses, Raman says, but a paper just needs to reflect the conclusion, not the debate. Professor Dominic Dwyer, a member of the World Health Organisation’s mission to China to investigate the source of the pandemic, described Holmes’ conduct as “absolutely reasonable, and typical of good scientific debate”. Other researchers disagree. Professor David Relman, a microbiologist at Stanford University in California, says the evidence simply wasn’t strong enough to support the hypothesis in the scientific paper published in March 2020. The paper, Relman says, rested on the “faulty assumption” the Chinese had published all the sequences for viruses they held in their labs. “Some of these authors continue to show a lack of objectivity and a continued interest in overstating what we know and don’t know,” he tellsRichard Ebright, a molecular biologist at Rutgers University in New Jersey, who has become among the most-outspoken scientific critics of a natural origin, goes even further. He accuses the researchers of “scientific fraud”. The released emails “make it absolutely clear the authors knew the conclusions of the paper were unsound,” he says. “There is nothing – absolutely nothing – that resembles ‘a normal part of the scientific process’ in the process revealed by the authors’ correspondence.”stymie debate on the origins of COVID-19? While the paper calls a lab leak implausible, in the very next sentence it notes “more scientific data could swing the balance of evidence to favour one hypothesis over another”. Indeed, the acres of newsprint devoted to the topic would suggest little debate has been stoppered.Holmes, again, is incredulous.“This is not the 14th century. I’m not the Pope,” he says. “If you don’t believe it, write your own paper.” Some did. Several scientists, including Relman and Canadian evolutionary biologist Professor Michael Worobey, wrote a call for the lab leak hypothesis

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

theage /  🏆 8. in AU

 

Australia Latest News, Australia Headlines

Similar News: You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Eddie Jones’ selection stunner as Wallabies kickoff World CupEddie Jones’ selection stunner as Wallabies kickoff World Cup‘We’re ready to go - F1 - whatever car you like in F1, the fast one, we’re just about ready to take off.’
Read more »

Eddie Jones explains Ben Donaldson selection, says Wallabies ‘F1 car ready to take off’Eddie Jones explains Ben Donaldson selection, says Wallabies ‘F1 car ready to take off’Jones explains rookie’s World Cup selection, says Wallabies are ‘F1 car ready to take off’
Read more »

Arch underdogs Australia enter Rugby World Cup with Eddie Jones under scrutinyArch underdogs Australia enter Rugby World Cup with Eddie Jones under scrutinyDespite losing all five of their warm-up games, the draw has been kind for the Wallabies, but they will watch out for Fiji
Read more »

Slow as she goes approach just the ticket for Eddie’s WallabiesSlow as she goes approach just the ticket for Eddie’s WallabiesThe Wallabies will (probably) just win their World Cup opener, and that’s just what Australia’s coach wants.
Read more »

Slow as she goes approach just the ticket for Eddie’s WallabiesSlow as she goes approach just the ticket for Eddie’s WallabiesThe Wallabies will (probably) just win their World Cup opener, and that’s just what Australia’s coach wants.
Read more »

Slow as she goes approach just the ticket for Eddie’s WallabiesSlow as she goes approach just the ticket for Eddie’s WallabiesThe Wallabies will (probably) just win their World Cup opener, and that’s just what Australia’s coach wants.
Read more »