UK Supreme Court Rules Sending Asylum Seekers to Rwanda Unlawful

News News

UK Supreme Court Rules Sending Asylum Seekers to Rwanda Unlawful
UKSupreme CourtAsylum Seekers
  • 📰 _TCglobal
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 14 sec. here
  • 10 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 37%
  • Publisher: 83%

The UK Supreme Court ruled that sending asylum seekers to Rwanda was unlawful. The court's decision is grounded in the view that Rwanda is unsafe for asylum seekers because it might force them to return to their home country. The ruling has implications not only for the UK's migration policy but also for Rwanda and the refugees already residing there.

The UK Supreme Court ruled that sending asylum seekers to Rwanda was unlawful. The plan would have seen tens of thousands of asylum seekers sent from the UK to Rwanda , which would then process and host such refugees indefinitely. The court's decision is grounded in the view that Rwanda is unsafe for asylum seekers because it might force them to return to their home country.

Forced return is against international human rights law as refugees and asylum seekers may be persecuted again in their country of origin. The ruling has implications not only for the UK's migration policy but also for Rwanda and the refugees already residing there

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

_TCglobal /  🏆 4. in AU

UK Supreme Court Asylum Seekers Rwanda Unlawful Refugees Human Rights Migration Policy

Australia Latest News, Australia Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

UK Supreme Court Rules Government's Plan to Send Asylum Seekers to Rwanda UnlawfulUK Supreme Court Rules Government's Plan to Send Asylum Seekers to Rwanda UnlawfulThe UK supreme court has unanimously ruled that the government’s plan to send asylum seekers to Rwanda is unlawful. The court found that asylum seekers sent to Rwanda may be at risk of refoulement and cited evidence from the UN refugee agency (UNHCR) that Rwanda does not respect the principle of non-refoulement.
Read more »

UK supreme court to rule whether plan to send asylum seekers to Rwanda is lawfulUK supreme court to rule whether plan to send asylum seekers to Rwanda is lawfulA ruling against the Tory policy on 15 November likely to increase pressure on Sunak to leave European convention on human rights
Read more »

US Supreme Court to weigh whether abusers have right to own gunsUS Supreme Court to weigh whether abusers have right to own gunsThe conservative US Supreme Court has an opportunity on Tuesday to clarify its latest case law on the right to bear arms, which has caused confusion in American courts -- though it remains to be seen whether it will seize it.
Read more »

Perth’s Supreme Court judges gaPerth’s Supreme Court judges gaJustice Gail Archer leads vocals, Justice Bruno Fiannaca plays, well, everything, while Chief Justice Peter Quinlan is Lex Parte’s regular drummer.
Read more »

Tasmanian Supreme Court judge told to take leave until further notice over 'significant matter'Tasmanian Supreme Court judge told to take leave until further notice over 'significant matter'The state's Attorney-General says he is taking the matter 'very seriously' and the Chief Justice has asked the judge to take leave 'until further notice'.
Read more »

Supreme Court rules order to shut down I Cook Foods invalidSupreme Court rules order to shut down I Cook Foods invalidA Supreme Court judge has ruled the order used to shut down catering company I Cook Foods following allegations of a listeria outbreak was invalid. The case, which became known as 'slug gate' after allegations a slug was planted in the I Cook Foods kitchen, ended on Monday with the finding a win for business owner Ian Cook and his family, but he won't be awarded any compensation.
Read more »



Render Time: 2025-02-16 12:19:56